Advanced
Memo reviewer: identify gaps, weak logic, and missing evidence
Reviews a draft memo for logic gaps, unsupported assertions, and missing evidence; proposes edits. Useful for managers and partners reviewing technical memos.
Review the draft technical memo and provide improvement edits.
Inputs:
- Draft memo text: {draft_memo}
- Framework/standards: {framework}
- Risk tolerance and materiality: {risk_materiality}
Output:
1) High-level assessment (strengths/risks).
2) Line-by-line comments on unclear logic or unsupported claims.
3) Missing evidence checklist and questions to resolve.
4) Suggested revised wording for the top 5 highest-impact sections.
Be specific and constructive.Related Prompts
Technical Research
IntermediateLiterature comparison: GAAP vs IFRS treatment summary
Creates a side-by-side summary of GAAP vs IFRS differences for a given topic, including practical implications. Useful for multinational reporting and policy alignment.
GPT-5.2 Thinking; GPT-4.1; o3-mini
0
0
2
Technical Research
AdvancedDisclosure requirement finder: what to disclose and where
Identifies required disclosures for a topic and maps them to footnote sections and data sources. Useful for reporting teams and technical accountants.
GPT-5.2 Thinking; GPT-4.1; o3-mini
0
0
2
Technical Research
IntermediateAudit response memo: defend accounting position to auditors
Drafts a concise response to auditor questions with evidence mapping and professional tone. Useful for controllers responding to audit queries efficiently.
GPT-5.2 Thinking; GPT-4.1; o3-mini
0
0
0